Category: social issues

THE GOSPEL AND PATRIOTISM

The Gospel and Patriotism

Dr. John P. Davis

Note: I am indebted to Steve Wilkins’ article on “Biblical Patriotism” for some of the major points and the basic thrust of this blogpost.

Recently in the United States, the last Monday in May was marked by the remembrance of those who have given their lives as members of the Armed Forces of the United States of America. In just one week on July 4 we will celebrate Independence Day. National occasions such as this raise the question of ‘what does it mean for a Christian to be patriotic?’ Were you to draw a continuum of Christian opinions on this subject you would have a myriad of views including pacifists, ‘just war’ proponents, some who will not swear loyalty to any earthly government, others who are actively involved in the political process, etc. Read more »

A synopsis of Sunday’s Message- Encountering an Outcast – Mark 1:40-45

In this text we will be gleaning from Jesus’ encounter with a societal outcast – someone who has been pushed to the edge of a stable life in the city.

Listen to this unusual story:

Mark 1:40-45
40 ¶ And a leper came to him, imploring him, and kneeling said to him, “If you will, you can make me clean.” 41 Moved with pity, he stretched out his hand and touched him and said to him, “I will; be clean.” 42 And immediately the leprosy left him, and he was made clean. 43 And Jesus sternly charged him and sent him away at once, 44 and said to him, “See that you say nothing to anyone, but go, show yourself to the priest and offer for your cleansing what Moses commanded, for a proof to them.” 45 But he went out and began to talk freely about it, and to spread the news, so that Jesus could no longer openly enter a town, but was out in desolate places, and people were coming to him from every quarter. Read more »

West Philly Prayer Vigil @ Murder Sites

038As members of the Police Clergy in the 16th Police District of Philadelphia, Steve and John Davis and their wives participated in a prayer vigil with other clergy in the 16th and 19th Police Districts.  The police clergy organize prayer vigils in city neighborhoods where a homicide has taken place.  Earlier this year a pizza delivery man was murdered at 41st and Aspen Sts. in the 16th District and another homicide occurred at 57th and Filbert Sts. in the 19th District.  Grace Church of Philly lies within the 16th Police District.

At prayer vigils, those attending walk through the immediate neighborhood and provide information packets which list government and private resources dealing with crime and violence. Also, prayer and counsel are offered to people along with gospel tracts and church information. A number of people were glad to engage in conversations about the gospel and to receive prayer for both the spiritual and temporal needs.

The Leadership Team of Grace Church of Philly meets monthly with the Police Clergy, the captains of 16th and 19th Police Districts, and the Community Policing Officers.

These meetings provide information on the needs of the districts and how clergy can work together to make a difference in the community.  Grace Church of Philly hosted one of these meetings in March at the Grace Community Center on Lancaster Ave. and will host another one in November.

Our Philosophy of Ministry

Along with others on our leadership team, I currently find myself in a ministry context of planting a new church in an urban area that is racially, culturally, and socio-economically diverse. Add to this mixture a highly transient student and young, urban professional population and further challenges to long-term ministry become immediately evident. In this short piece I will set forth my philosophy of ministry in general (regardless of any temporal or geographical circumstances) and my philosophy of ministry in the immediate context of University City, Philadelphia.

GCP Ministry Philosophy 4G TRIMThe ultimate goal of my life is to serve and minister in a way that is radically Christ-centered, radically gospel-centered, and radically other-centered by the power of the Holy Spirit to the glory of God the Father (Matt. 22:34-40; 28:18-20). It is the God-man Jesus Christ whose life, death, burial, resurrection, and ascension gives meaning to the gospel and displays for me the precious value of each and every human life (John 3:16; 1 Cor. 15:1-8; 1 John 4:9-10). It is through the gospel that I am reconciled to this Jesus and empowered to love and serve others (Rom. 1:16; 5:5; 1 John 4:19). It is through indiscriminately loving others that I can live out this gospel and serve Christ by serving others (Matt. 25:31-46; 1 John 3:14-19).

Read more »

Evangelism and Discipleship in a Post-Everything World

These are some scattered reflections on doing ministry in a post-everything world:

a. Do evangelism and discipleship in the context of community.

b. Make your conversation with pre-Christians and young Christians more like a slow dance than a war.

c. Recognize a post-everything’s need to belong before he believes.

d. See evangelism as a wholistic process, not just the “saving of souls.”

e. Realize that though Jesus is the only way to God there are many roads to Jesus.

f. Rediscover that appreciation of beauty often precedes acceptance of truth.

g. Our evangelism must show that the “meta-narrative” of Scripture is one of compassion and not the abuse of power. 

h. Since suffering is a universal for all human beings, we must show how the biblical message best answers the questions of suffering. 

Our calling to minister in a post-everything world should evidence the following:

1) openness to the task,

2) a curiosity in another’s story,

3) an empathy that is willing to laugh and cry with others,

4) a willingness to wait for an invitation,

5) a desire to create a place for provision, where we deal with the harm of living in a fallen world.

Finally, if we as Christians will minister effectively, we must recapture playfulness and humility.

Neo-docetism and the Judgment of God

JesusHealingIf one asked the average American Christian why ancient Israel was punished by God and sent into captivity, the usual response would probably center around the nation’s disobedience to the covenant, or its idolatrous tendencies, or some combination of both. Rarely, if ever, would one expect to hear anything about the failure of the nation to seek after social justice or care for the poor.

However, the Holy Spirit of God speaks very clearly to Israel through His prophet Isaiah that a failure to look after the poor was a major component in the broader picture of judgment upon the nation:

Is. 1:10 (ESV) Hear the word of the LORD, you rulers of Sodom! Give ear to the teaching of our God, you people of Gomorrah!  11 “What to me is the multitude of your sacrifices? says the LORD; I have had enough of burnt offerings of rams and the fat of well-fed beasts; I do not delight in the blood of bulls, or of lambs, or of goats.  12 “When you come to appear before me, who has required of you this trampling of my courts?  13 Bring no more vain offerings; incense is an abomination to me. New moon and Sabbath and the calling of convocations—I cannot endure iniquity and solemn assembly…. 16 Wash yourselves; make yourselves clean; remove the evil of your deeds from before my eyes; cease to do evil, 17 learn to do good; seek justice, correct oppression; bring justice to the fatherless, plead the widow’s cause (emphasis added).

Read more »

On Holistic Ministry

I’ve written previously on the imbalance in the ministry philosophy of churches on the right and on the left. Conservative evangelical and fundamental churches on the right have the saving gospel message, but are largely ineffective in reaching our culture because they lack in genuine, Christ-like, unconditional love.

Liberal mainline churches on the left do not preach the gospel message and the need for conversion, but are much more active in reaching out in love to the culture around them. However, because their social ministries are not properly rooted in and performed alongside the gospel of grace, they lack the power of the Holy Spirit. Whatever change is wrought through such ministries is fleeting and ephemeral. Taking an eternal view, such ministries merely make the earth a better place for souls to go to hell from.

tim-kellerThe great need of our day is for the body of Christ to rid itself of the inchoate faith of the right and the biblically-uninformed, anthropocentric faith of the left and embrace a full-bodied, biblically-faithful, socially conscious, holistic Christian faith that can radically impact our post-Church society for Jesus Christ.

Following are some quotes from urban church planter, philosopher, and theologian Tim Keller (2002) on holistic ministry:

Have a counter-intuitive holistic ministry. Most people have a very powerful desire (need?) to place a church somewhere on an ideological spectrum from “Liberal/Left wing” to “Conservative/Right wing.” There is nothing more crucial than to use the gospel in the life of our church to defy such stereotypes and to (thus) become impossible to categorize. On the one hand, the gospel of Christ and justification-by-faith brings deep, powerful psychological changes. Though I am sinful, I am accepted through Christ. This discovery converts people, so they sing, “My chains fell off, my heart was free; I rose, went forth, and followed Thee.” On the other hand, the gospel of the cross and the kingdom brings deep powerful social changes. It defies the values of the world – power, status, recognition and wealth. The gospel is triumph through weakness, wealth through poverty, power through service. This changes our attitude toward the poor and toward our own status, wealth and careers.

Together, these two sides of the gospel’s influence create a unique kind of church. So many fundamentalist churches tend to be legalistic in their approach, even if they technically believe in justification by faith! Therefore, though they stress evangelism, they are not all that attractive or effective. Legalism does not produce reciprocal love for those without faith. On the other hand, so many liberal churches, though they stress social justice, are not all that effective at it. Their people’s lives are not electrified by conversion. They do not have deep experiences that humble them and change the way they look at the poor. Therefore, a gospel-centered church should have a social justice emphasis and effectiveness that greatly exceeds the liberal churches. Meanwhile, it should have an evangelistic fervor that greatly exceeds the ordinary fundamentalist churches. This gospel-driven, counter-intuitive combination of zeal can only come through teaching, prayer and repentance.

Jesus considered a concern for the poor to be a mark of his presence (Matt. 11:5). Increasingly, in a globalized world, we will win neither the elites nor the masses unless we embody the gospel in strong ministry to people with economic and material needs as well as spiritual. “The renewal of Christ’s salvation ultimately includes a renewed universe…there is no part of our existence that is untouched by His blessing. Christ’s miracles were miracles of the Kingdom, performed as signs of what the Kingdom means…His blessing was pronounced upon the poor, the afflicted, the burdened and heavy-laden who came to Him and believed in Him. The miraculous signs that attested Jesus’ deity and authenticated the witness of those who transmitted the gospel to the church is not continued, for their purpose was fulfilled. But the pattern of the kingdom that was revealed through those signs must continue in the church…Kingdom evangelism is therefore holistic as it transmits by word and deed the promise of Christ for the body and soul as well as the demand of Christ for body and soul” (Edmund P. Clowney, in The Pastor Evangelist)….

Jesus says that a sign of the gospel is faith. Matthew 5:4-7 says, If you “only greet your brother, what do ye more than others?” Since the Jewish greeting was Shalom! and an embrace, Jesus is saying much. We must show our uniqueness by following our Lord who always embraced the moral and spiritual outsider. Matt. 21:31 – “The prostitute and the tax collectors are entering the Kingdom of God before you.” If you understand the gospel of grace, you treat the other: A) With respect. Grace means the non-believer may be a better person. B) With courage. Grace means the non-believer’s possible rejection of us is not so fearsome. C) With hope. Grace means you are a miracle and no one is beyond hope. No other worldview can produce this combination of humility and confidence (pp. 105-106).  

Reference

Keller, Timothy J. and J. Allen Thompson, Church Planter Manual, New York: Redeemer Church Planting Center, 2002.

Dealing with the Disadvantaged

Dealing with the Disadvantaged

Deuteronomy 23:15-16

Dr. John P. Davis

 

Deuteronomy 23:15-16   15 ¶ “You shall not give up to his master a slave who has escaped from his master to you.  16 He shall dwell with you, in your midst, in the place that he shall choose within one of your towns, wherever it suits him. You shall not wrong him.

This text at first glance may seem foreign to us, because of the change in social climate from the ancient world of Israel to today. However, if we would open our eyes, I believe that we’d begin to realize that there are people all about us who are disadvantaged in a similar way that a runaway slave might be vulnerable. Though slavery in the technical sense does not exist in America, yet in a very practical way slavery is all around us. There are many who due to misfortune in life are bound to adverse circumstances and who are crying for someone to help them. Whether it’s the homeless, the jobless, the poor, the immigrant, the ill, the aged, etc., if we’ll open our eyes we’ll find many that experience a form of slavery.

 How should a Christian relate to those in such a situation? What can we learn from these verses that instruct us on how to deal with the disadvantaged?

First I will make a few introductory remarks about slavery in ancient Israel that help elucidate the meaning of the text and then I will draw three applications to our own setting..

 These two verses are found in the greater unit of thought that begins at 22:13 and ends at 24:22. This unit of thought covers matters affecting the social welfare of the nation. Israelite law, in contrast to the existing contemporary laws of its age, placed a high priority on human life and human rights, grounded in the belief that all men were created in the image of God. Even though the system of Jewish law did not abrogate slavery, it yet allowed its concept of God and humanity to permeate its approach to the issue of slavery.

Permanent involuntary slavery was to be imposed only on Israel’s enemies taken captive in war. Temporary involuntary slavery was at times the experience of fellow Israelites who because of adverse economic conditions were placed in temporary servitude, with their debt being cancelled after six years. Voluntary slavery took place when an Israelite whose debt was cancelled preferred the apparent security of slavery over freedom. He then had his ear pierced with an awl.

This particular text is dealing with foreign slaves who have fled from their masters seeking asylum in Israel. This passage is basically teaching that ” … runaway slaves are entitled to asylum in any Israelite village “  (Nicholson 1967, 54). Although in the Ancient Near East there existed suzerain treaty provisions for the return of runaway slaves, Israel was exempted from this stipulation, because she was the vassal of Yahweh alone (Clifford 1982, 125). Israel in her experience of freedom was to be the guardian of the freedom of others. Because of her own experience of slavery and present enjoyment of freedom (ca. Exodus 20:2), her society was to be made up of free men (Phillips 1984, 62) and they, as God’s people, were to be ” …the friends of freedom … (Cunliffe Jones 1956, 133).                       

 There are three principles that are to govern our dealings with the disadvantaged:

  I. The People of God should be a place of refuge for the disadvantaged. You shall not give up to his master a slave who has escaped from his master to you

 Apparently there was something so attractive about the society of Israel that occasioned such instances as runaway slaves seeking asylum in asylum. Certainly as merchants passed through Israel they and their servants would have noticed the elevated status of slaves and the humaneness with which they were treated. The freedom of this people must have been enviable.

As Yahweh was the refuge of Israel, so Israel, the people of God, was to be a refuge to the world.

 I’m afraid that the church of Jesus Christ has often failed in this respect. Our lack of compassion on the disadvantaged is evidenced in many ways.

How many families want to go to the nursing home to minister?

How many people want to be involved in prison ministry?

How many are interested in working with immigrants and illegal aliens?

Who would think of taking an international student into their home?

Who wants to provide foster care for a refugee?

How many are reaching the homeless or are involved in literacy? (Are not the illiterate a disadvantaged people who are slaves, often involuntarily to their circumstances?)

If the church of Jesus Christ is not a refuge for the disadvantaged of this world and if believers have no personal desire to provide a refuge, where then will the disadvantaged find a refuge in this world?

 Have the disadvantaged of this world been turned away so often that they no longer think of the church as a place of refuge for those who are oppressed?

Have the disadvantaged witnessed in the evangelical church such fear, indifference, and reticence toward them that they have concluded, “they really don’t care.”

Can the disadvantaged of this world possibly come to believe in a merciful, caring, loving God if the people of that God are not merciful enough to provide a refuge?

 II. The people of God should provide an environment that encourages the right of self-determination.

He shall dwell with you, in your midst, in the place that he shall choose within one of your towns, wherever it suits him.

 One characteristic which distinguishes humanity from the rest of creation is the right of self-determination. Humans were created to enjoy freedom under God, and apart from the situations mentioned in the introduction and some legal circumstances, this freedom is not to be denied. Ownership of another is essentially a prerogative of God.

 One of the privileges of a free man is the fulfillment of his own desires (wherever it suits him). A slave is one who lives out the desires of another.  It is also to be recognized that one of the privileges of a free man is the exercise of personal choice (in the place that he shall choose).

The disadvantaged are so imprisoned by their circumstances that their desires and dreams remain imprisoned and their ability to choose is non-existent.

 To deny either of these privileges to a man is to abrogate his God-given freedom.

The people of God should be committed to creating the kind of environments where disadvantaged people can enjoy the freedom of self-determination. The church should avoid programs (as many government programs) that only create another kind of dependency, a milder, kinder form of slavery, yet, nevertheless, still slavery.

As in missions, this principle of self-determination encourages the kind of indigeneity that lessens dependency, and when applied to ministry to the oppressed, it moves toward ministry that is more developmentally oriented.

III. The people of God see the immorality of oppressing the disadvantaged in any way.

     “You shall not wrong him

 The older translations catch the nuance of this word (to wrong) by translating it with the word ‘oppress.’ The people of God knew a little about oppression from their years in Egypt. Because of the mercy they received in God’s powerful deliverance of them, they were to extend that same mercy to others.

Exodus 22:21 ¶ “You shall not wrong a sojourner or oppress him, for you were sojourners in the land of Egypt.

The gospel of Christ calls all of those who have been delivered by its power to extend a similar mercy to others.

Luke 6:32-36  32 ¶ “If you love those who love you, what benefit is that to you? For even sinners love those who love them.  33 And if you do good to those who do good to you, what benefit is that to you? For even sinners do the same.  34 And if you lend to those from whom you expect to receive, what credit is that to you? Even sinners lend to sinners, to get back the same amount.  35 But love your enemies, and do good, and lend, expecting nothing in return, and your reward will be great, and you will be sons of the Most High, for he is kind to the ungrateful and the evil.  36 Be merciful, even as your Father is merciful.

Are we who are recipients of mercy guilty of practicing oppression or of tolerating oppression?

How about the migrant farm worker who is paid $ 4.50 an hour for work that others are paid $ 8.00. an hour?    

How about the distressed woman who comes to your employ, who really needs a job, she’s in times of difficulty, so you do her a big favor by paying her less than you would pay others.    

How about the teenager in your employ, who works as hard and as well as a grown man, but he’s a teenager, so you take advantage of him.

We seem to have an unwritten business ethic in America that says, if someone is really hurting in life, squeeze him (oppress him) as tightly as you can.  For too many the bottom line is profit rather than human dignity.

We have seen the business men (and now governments) that watch a company begin to struggle financially, and invariably, will come along in that moment of desperation to make an offer of much less than what its worth, taking advantage of their distress.

How about that yard sale, when you come across a family that’s selling everything they own because hard times have come their way, and you walk in with that enterprising spirit, realizing how desperate they are, and you make an offer you know isn’t fair, but they’re desperate so they have to take it. You have just violated the intent of this text.

To oppress anyone, especially the disadvantaged, is to show the utmost disrespect for human life.

To oppress others, especially the disadvantaged, is to live in blatant violation of the second greatest commandment, “You shall love your neighbor as yourself.”

 To oppress others or to fail to deliver them from oppression is contrary to the call of the gospel. 

Conclusion:

A model ethical portrait of the people of God is provided in Ezekiel:

Ezekiel 18:5-9   5 ¶ “If a man is righteous and does what is just and right–  6 if he does not eat upon the mountains or lift up his eyes to the idols of the house of Israel, does not defile his neighbor’s wife or approach a woman in her time of menstrual impurity,  7 does not oppress anyone, but restores to the debtor his pledge, commits no robbery, gives his bread to the hungry and covers the naked with a garment,  8 does not lend at interest or take any profit, withholds his hand from injustice, executes true justice between man and man,  9 walks in my statutes, and keeps my rules by acting faithfully–he is righteous; he shall surely live, declares the Lord GOD.

 The high calling of this model ethic requires an ongoing, transforming experience of the grace and mercy of God which only comes as the life Christ is manifested in us through the Spirit.

 

 

BIBLIOGRAPHY

 Clifford, Richard. Deuteronomy. Wilmington: Michael Glazier, Inc., 1982.

Cunliffe Jones, H. Deuteronomy. London: SCM Press, 1956.

Nicholson, E. W. Deuteronomy and Tradition. Philadelphia: Fortress Press, 1967.

Phillips, Anthony. “The Laws of Slavery: Exodus 21:2Ð11.” JSOT 30 (1984), 51-66.

The Church and Social Issues

The following is an excerpt from Kevin DeYoung and Ted Kluck’s Why We’re Not Emergent (By Two Guys Who Should Be) (Chicago: Moody, 2008):

WhyWereNotEmergent-546

Shouldn’t we care for the poor and the unborn? Shouldn’t we care about justice and righteousness? After all, “religion that is pure and undefiled before God, the Father, is this: to visit orphans and widows in their affliction, and to keep oneself unstained from the world” (James 1:27, emphasis added).

More generally, Christians on the right and left must remember that while Jesus’ message certainly had political implications (most notably, He was Lord and Caesar was not), Jesus never started a political party, nor do we have any record of Him crusading against social and political ills. It’s true that the gospel has social implications. But the social gospel is something else entirely. Rauschenbusch and his followers often equated social action with the gospel so that the kingdom of God was no longer concerned with individual salvation and future life, but with the elimination of intolerance, corruption, injustice, and militarism. This message is hardly a secret or lost one since the mainline Protestant establishment has been saying it for a hundred years. The problem is not in working toward the elimination of injustice, though the specific activities lumped under “justice” are often debatable. The problem is in thinking that this is the main business of the church as church. But when the church’s business is mainly political and its unifying creeds are political instead of doctrinal, the church and state overlap until the church becomes redundant. Which is why the Religious Right has been getting such a beating of late, and why people are leaving the politically liberal mainline churches in droves, and why the emerging church will become little more than a venue for left-leaning politics if they continue to view historic Christian doctrine and faith as ancillary to the gospel.

The emergent church, like Protestant liberalism before it, is quite certain about God’s politics yet equally uncertain about God’s theology. I’m just the opposite. I don’t claim to have the divine word on minimum wage increases, activist judges, or global warming. Don’t get me wrong – I have opinions on these subjects and hope these opinions are well informed and perhaps even right. But I am much more certain about God’s view on the atonement than I am about His view on CEO salaries. On the right and the left, we would all do well to heed Hart’s advice as he summarizes the 1969 guidelines from the Lutheran Church, Missouri Synod (LCMS):

On rare occasions the church’s influence may be “direct and intentional” when some social issues present themselves “about which the Scriptures speak so explicitly and clearly” that the institutional church is bound to speak. But because this kind of influence “always carries the risk of politicizing the church,” it should be done infrequently and “only on the basis of clear and unambiguous teaching of Scripture, where the church’s most fundamental concerns are at stake…. It asserted that the LCMS should “remain alert to the hazard of issuing superficial moral judgments or urging particular forms of action in complex secular matters for which there is no clear Word of God.”

This makes refreshingly good sense to me. Too often well-meaning Republicans and Democrats have been quick to politicize the gospel, unnecessarily alienating their brothers and sisters, and quick to pronounce divinely sanctioned judgments on things they don’t understand. I guess as a gospel minister I tend to focus on, well, the gospel – the life, death, and resurrection of Jesus. I am dogmatic, yet humble (I hope), about orthodoxy, while I am open-minded, yet opinionated, about politics. That is to say, the difference between emerging churches and what I am aiming for in my church is the difference between unity based on social issues and unity based on theological issues. Orthodoxy means right doctrine that overflows in right living, which can be variously applied in the political sphere. For emerging churches, however, it seems that orthodoxy means right living immediately applied in the political sphere without attention to doctrine (190-92).

Suburbolationism and American Christianity

 

anomie
[Above image: "Anomie" by Ana Susanj]
————
Suburbolationism and American Christianity: Turning the Page on the Anti-Urban Bias of the Church in America

There exists today an epic crisis in America’s urban areas. This crisis of crime, impoverishment, and anomie has been exacerbated and facilitated over the last several decades by the mass exodus of middle-class Christians from the city to the suburbs. This exodus has left a vacuum of resources both economic and spiritual. While they may exhibit some short-term external benefits, social and political solutions to this crisis can never suffice to bring about a full resolution of the structural problems within our cities. It is only the mighty power of the everlasting Gospel that can transform the heart and life of those within the city. The American Church must turn its eyes back to the city as a place teeming with the very people that Jesus has called us to love and serve: the poor and the outcast.

            The problems in America’s cities are multitudinous: anomie, poverty, homelessness, crime, desolation (spiritual, moral, and physical), decay, addiction, and so on. Unfortunately, the Christian Church has behaved in a way that facilitated the downward spiral of the American cityscape into this state of crisis. Over the last few generations, evangelical Christians have fled the city for the relative peace and safety of the suburbs, and in so doing, have all but abandoned the city as a place to be avoided and even despised. More importantly, Christians have not only abandoned the city, but have abandoned the people who live in the city, both believers and unbelievers alike. Largely as a result of this flight, “The city…remains the repository of the poor and powerless” (Henslin, 2008, p. 409).

            Evangelical flight from our nation’s cities was and is a powerful indicator of a larger-scale, ongoing cultural disengagement by the middle class. The departure of the middle class has left the city devoid of resources, both material and personal. For decades, white Christians with money have fled the city for the suburbs and left behind a “mostly brown and black population that was often bereft of resources” (Byassee, 2008, p. 22). Without these spiritual and physical resources it is terribly difficult, if not impossible, for the city to be renewed in righteousness. Unless and until the Church repents from its neo-monastic stance and behavior and turns its eyes upon our nation’s urban areas, wickedness will continue to reign in our cities and we can expect no real lasting spiritual and cultural change to occur in these areas.

            Government and social programs can assist to alleviate suffering and chaos only in the short run; long-term solutions can only be realized as a result of deep-rooted, spiritual-structural change. Such transformation can only be found in the Gospel. Urban regeneration and renewal must begin with and focus on individual people as holistic beings made up of physical, mental, and spiritual components.

The main purpose of regeneration in urban (or indeed any other) areas must always be the promotion and encouragement of all that will enable human beings to flourish. In this sense, one of the failings, from a Christian perspective, of many statements about [urban] regeneration is that they fail to offer an understanding of what it means to be human…. My argument is that one of the things that Christian theology can offer to urban regeneration…is a strong reminder that regeneration is about enabling everyone to flourish, in every sense (Knights, 2008, p. 220, emphasis in original).

            In order for the city to experience renewal there must first be a renewal and regeneration of individual human hearts within the city. [1] This type of transformation can only be wrought by the power of God through the Gospel of Jesus Christ. While we cannot and should not disparage the impact of social programs that are enacted to combat the various social problems within the city, we must keep these human constructions in a proper context. These institutional arrangements can never bring ultimate or lasting renewal to the city. It is only the grace of God through Jesus Christ that has the power to transform a landscape of chaos, brokenness, and dependency into an environment of love, wholeness, and sustainability.

            It is important to note that this environment of grace will, in all probability, manifest itself incrementally. While God can act swiftly and bring social-spiritual transformation in the blink of an eye, often in this dispensation of grace He acts in an incremental fashion throughout society. [2] Even in periods of great spiritual revival, one can sense order in the process, rather than wide scale upheaval and instant social transformation. [3] Perhaps it is that the Lord works in this fashion in order to soothe our anxieties, as humans are wont to abjure change rather than embrace it, even if the change is for the good. An understanding of this dynamic reality can help to prevent Christian workers in urban areas from becoming too quickly discouraged or burnt out. It can assist Christians in keeping their focus on the task at hand, their hands to the plow (Luke 9:62), working and serving diligently for the glory of God (1 Cor. 10:31). 

The Importance of the City

            The city is “a place of shelter for the weak and different” (Keller & Thompson, 2002, p. 45). It is a place that the poor and the outcast flee to for refuge. The city is a place of mercy for those who would not be able to survive in other settings: “The city is always a more merciful place for minorities of all kinds. The dominant majorities often dislike cities, but the weak and powerless need them. They cannot survive in suburbs and small towns” (Keller & Thompson, 2002, 45).

            As a place where the poor and needy congregate, one would expect it to be a place to which the followers of Jesus Christ would flock. You know, the same Jesus who taught us how to be merciful unto those in need, as in the parable of the good Samaritan (Luke 10:29-37); the same One who taught us to freely minister to “the least of these” in society (Matt. 25:45)’ this same Jesus who taught His followers to heartily serve those who are unable to repay them such as “the poor, the crippled, the lame” (Luke 14:13-14, 21). Unfortunately, it seems that many suburban evangelical ministries have rendered themselves urban-crippled and metro-lame through the dogged pursuit of things belonging to the kingdom of this world. The sectarian political agenda of the Republican Party and the quest to secure the comforts and conveniences of the mirage of a suburban/rural utopia appear to be two areas where suburban Christianity devotes much of its energy and attention.

            The kinds of Christians bred in twentieth and early-twenty-first century evangelical churches simply do not seem to take well to the teachings of Jesus with respect to the spread of the gospel in the cities and the care of the poor who congregate there. Mercy ministries as a whole are looked upon with suspicion in many churches. A neo-docetic [4] view of humanity has comfortably nestled down into our midst. Instead of viewing people in a holistic fashion, Christians seem to be obsessed with the spiritual needs of others to the total neglect of their physical needs. Perhaps the Church is in need of a reminder that human beings are composed of bodies, minds, souls, and spirits: “not as discrete compartments, but as overlapping facets, and all need to be attended to” (Knights, 2008, p. 221, emphasis added).

            American Christians seem to pour most, if not all, of their resources back into their existing congregations in a frantic attempt to create a womb-like subculture that is insulated from the ravages experienced in urban areas. Pouring energy and resources into people that exist outside of the Christian community simply does not appear to be an option in many ministries. Such ministries may devote a percentage of their tithes and offerings to missions and church planting. But these efforts, to the extent that any of this allotment is invested in the city, goes mainly toward creating “Christ-against-the-city” clone communities that then proceed to gather and isolate new groups of Christians within the safety of their freshly-built walls. At other times, the city may be engaged in a “hit-and-run” fashion whereby Christians run into the city in small groups to accomplish a specific ministry task, such as a homeless outreach, only to leave and return intermittently, if ever again.

            Of the churches that do engage in the planting of new churches, these new ministries are, overwhelmingly, planted in areas similar to the originating church’s own suburban and rural environment. Rare is the conservative evangelical church that catches a vision to plant a vibrant, passionate, Christ-loving ministry in the city. Not only has the local church abandoned the city, but many within the church also refuse to lift a finger to invest in the lives and future of those who live in the city.

            Church planter Tim Keller teaches that, throughout the ages, God’s people have been called to live in and love the city:

When Nebuchadnezzar sacked Jerusalem, he brought thousands of Jewish exiles to live in the pagan mega-city of Babylon. At first the exiles refused to move into the wicked city, settling outside in their own enclave, but God spoke to them through Jeremiah and gave them a startling mandate. First, he spoke to them of their actions toward the city. He told them to move in, settle down, raise their families there, and invest in the economy of the city (Jer. 29:5-6). Second, he spoke to them of their attitude toward the city. He said, “Seek the shalom of the city” (v.7). The word ‘shalom’ meant full flourishing-economically, culturally, spiritually. And most amazing of all, God [in v. 7] said, “Pray to the Lord for it, for if it prospers, you prosper” (Keller, 2005, emphasis in original).  

            While God does not call all Christians to relocate to the city, it does seem clear that, given its great lack of the love, mercy, and compassion of God, more Christians should begin to sense the urgency of bringing the Gospel and love of Christ to these places of greatest need.

Impacting the Broader Culture Through City Renewal

            Suburbolationist Christians [5] frequently decry the moral decay of our nation and culture. However, they refuse to go into the very places where they can have the greatest impact on our nation and culture: the city. “If the Christian church wants to really change the country and culture, it must go into the cities themselves, not just into the suburbs or even the exurbs” (Keller & Thompson, 2002, p. 46).

            Many of today’s suburban church planters appear to have overlooked the fact that Paul’s ministry was carried out almost exclusively in urban areas. While many pious Christian leaders are overheard frequently decrying the pagan-ness of our society, it is interesting to note that the early church was urban, while the surrounding countryside was pagan. As a matter of fact, the word “pagan” is derived from paganus, which means “country-man” (Keller & Thompson, 2002, p. 46). Perhaps today’s Christian leaders and moralistic preachers should embrace the complete topographical reversal that has taken place since the early church and begin calling non-believers “urbans” instead of “pagans.” Certainly, this would be more etymologically appropriate and linguistically honest.

            Keller and Thompson state, “While there are millions of born-again Christians, they seem to be having no impact on the culture. The reasons given are usually complex and unconvincing. Nobody notices that Evangelicals are totally non-urban…. This is a recipe for complete cultural irrelevance” (2002, p. 48). Elsewhere, Keller states, “The modern U.S. church is fast losing cultural and economic force because it avoids the city” (2005).

            It appears clear that if Christians are serious about “reclaiming the culture for Christ,” they have to get serious about urban missions and renewal. Christians need to eschew the “privacy, safety, homogeneity, sentimentality, space, order and control” of their predominantly non-urban, middle class backgrounds (Keller, 2005) and begin to embrace the city with the love of Christ while it is still day, for the “night is coming, when no one can work” (John 9:4).

The Blessing of Urban Renewal

            The crisis in urban America will never ultimately be solved by political or social programs, no matter how well intentioned such efforts may be. The problems in our cities, to a great extent fueled by the mass exodus of middle-class Christians, can only be properly addressed and solved by the Gospel of Jesus Christ through the ministry of the Church. May our Lord grant a burden for the city to the present and future generations of the Church in order that we may fulfill our Christian responsibility to love our neighbors from the same heart into which Christ first poured His own love by the Holy Spirit of God (Rom. 5:5).

            In closing I would like to include a short poem by Sarah Brownsberger on the challenge and blessing of urban renewal:

            It wasn’t where we wanted to live

            but you have to put down roots to thrive.

            Daily we bore the shock of forbearance –

            our own and our neighbors’: the noise, the smell!

            Be fruitful! We tried. Soil of lead arsenate,

            cadmium. We added our detritus,

            peel and core: redemption. And now

            our mineral prison blooms in this,

            the year of our departure: now at last

            the berries fruit in blue abundance.

            Which goes to show our acts are not our own;

            what we make does not belong to us.

            At best we fade softly as timothy,

            and leave our harvest to the next people (2006, p. 8).

—————–

References:

Brownsberger, S. M. (2006). Urban Renewal. Christian Century, 123, p. 8. 

Byassee, J. (2008). The Church Downtown: Strategies for Urban Ministry. Christian Century, 125, p. 22-27, 29. 

Henslin, J. M. (2008). Social Problems: A Down-to-Earth Approach. Boston: Pearson/Allyn-Bacon.

The Holy Bible, English Standard Version. (2006). Version 2.1. Accordance Bible Software, Version 8.2.3, 2009. 

Keller, T. (2005). The City: Why We Are Here. The Gospel Coalition. Available: http://www.thegospelcoalition.org/resources/a/The-City—Why-We-Are-Here [22 June 2009].

Keller, T. J. & Thompson, J. A. (2002). Church Planter Manual. New York: Redeemer Church Planting Center.  

Knights, C. H. (2008). Urban Regeneration: A Theological Perspective from the West End of Newcastle-upon-Tyne. Expository Times, 119, p. 217-225. 


[1] I speak here of a “renewal” in the hearts of Christians living within the city and a “regeneration” of the hearts of unbelievers through the new birth.

[2] Cf. Matthew 13:33: “He told them another parable. ‘The kingdom of heaven is like leaven that a woman took and hid in three measures of flour, till it was all leavened.’” This speaks of transformation as a process that is not instantaneous, but rather orderly, organic, and dynamic in nature.

[3] It is only in the future that the Lord will work in an instantaneous way to “remove the iniquity of this land in a single day” (Zech. 3:9, emphasis added).

[4] Docetism was a heresy of the early Church. Adherents believed that Christ’s body was not truly human, but a phantasm of some sort. 

[5] “Suburbolationist Christians” are believers who are churched in the suburbs or exurbs, have created their own walled-off church subcultures, and take a militant, aggressive stance toward American culture. They basically ignore urban social concerns.

WordPress Themes